1950 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V

To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (548 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 443 more horse power than 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 514 kg more than 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1950 Alfa Romeo 6C 2013 Cadillac CTS-V
Make Alfa Romeo Cadillac
Model 6C CTS-V
Year Released 1950 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2443 cc 6200 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 105 HP 548 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 6100 RPM
Engine Bore Size 72 mm 103 mm
Engine Stroke Size 100 mm 92 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1400 kg 1914 kg
Vehicle Length 4690 mm 4859 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1884 mm
Vehicle Height 1510 mm 1422 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 77 L 68 L