1950 Allard J1 vs. 2002 Toyota ES 3
To start off, 2002 Toyota ES 3 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard J1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard J1 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard J1 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Allard J1 weights approximately 320 kg more than 2002 Toyota ES 3.
Because 1950 Allard J1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Allard J1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota ES 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Allard J1 | 2002 Toyota ES 3 | |
| Make | Allard | Toyota |
| Model | J1 | ES 3 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 3530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2320 mm |
