1950 Allard J1 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard J1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard J1 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard J1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1950 Allard J1. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard J1.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Allard J1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Allard J1. (203 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Allard J1.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard J1 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Allard | Ford |
Model | J1 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1950 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 209 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77.8 mm | 87.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 94 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2840 mm |