1950 Allard J1 vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard J1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard J1 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard J1 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 431 kg more than 1950 Allard J1.
Because 1950 Allard J1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Allard J1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C30 (400 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Allard J1. (203 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2010 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Allard J1.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard J1 | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Allard | Volvo |
Model | J1 | C30 |
Year Released | 1950 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2639 mm |