1950 Allard J1 vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard J1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard J1 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 320 kg more than 1950 Allard J1.
Because 1950 Allard J1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Allard J1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Allard J1 (203 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1950 Allard J1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Allard J1 | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Allard | Mini |
| Model | J1 | Countryman |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 155 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 77.8 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 85 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1340 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4097 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1993 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1561 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2595 mm |
