1950 Allard K1 vs. 1969 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1969 Ford Fairlane is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K1 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Allard K1 (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1969 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Allard K1 should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 243 kg more than 1950 Allard K1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Allard K1 | 1969 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Allard | Ford |
| Model | K1 | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2781 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1067 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5110 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2960 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 113 L | 40 L |
