1950 Allard K1 vs. 1981 Autobianchi A 112
To start off, 1981 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K1 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K1 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Allard K1 weights approximately 407 kg more than 1981 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1950 Allard K1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Allard K1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard K1 | 1981 Autobianchi A 112 | |
Make | Allard | Autobianchi |
Model | K1 | A 112 |
Year Released | 1950 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1067 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 113 L | 30 L |