1950 Allard K1 vs. 2000 Renault P55

To start off, 2000 Renault P55 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K1 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Renault P55 (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1950 Allard K1. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Renault P55 should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Renault P55 weights approximately 703 kg more than 1950 Allard K1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1950 Allard K1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Allard K1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault P55, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Renault P55 (260 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Allard K1. (203 Nm). This means 2000 Renault P55 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Allard K1. 2000 Renault P55 has automatic transmission and 1950 Allard K1 has manual transmission. 1950 Allard K1 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Renault P55 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: