1950 Allard K1 vs. 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K1 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K1 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 838 kg more than 1950 Allard K1.
Because 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Allard K1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer (382 Nm) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Allard K1. (203 Nm). This means 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Allard K1.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard K1 | 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Allard | Mitsubishi |
Model | K1 | Lancer |
Year Released | 1950 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 382 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1067 kg | 1905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 113 L | 71 L |