1950 Allard K1 vs. 2002 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2002 Mini Cooper is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K1 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Allard K1 (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2002 Mini Cooper. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Allard K1 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mini Cooper.
Because 1950 Allard K1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Allard K1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Allard K1 (203 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mini Cooper. (149 Nm). This means 1950 Allard K1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard K1 | 2002 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Allard | Mini |
Model | K1 | Cooper |
Year Released | 1950 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 149 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2470 mm |