1950 Allard K1 vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K1 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (162 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1950 Allard K1. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 403 kg more than 1950 Allard K1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (215 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Allard K1. (203 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Allard K1.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard K1 | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Allard | Mitsubishi |
Model | K1 | Outlander |
Year Released | 1950 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 162 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 215 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1067 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 113 L | 59 L |