1950 Allard K1 vs. 2006 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2006 GMC Yukon is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K1 would be higher. At 5,964 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Yukon (335 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 250 more horse power than 1950 Allard K1. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K1.
Because 2006 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Allard K1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Yukon (509 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 306 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Allard K1. (203 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2006 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Allard K1.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Allard K1 | 2006 GMC Yukon | |
| Make | Allard | GMC |
| Model | K1 | Yukon |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 5964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 335 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 509 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2950 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 113 L | 98 L |
