1950 Allard K1 vs. 2009 Jeep Compass

To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K1 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Compass (156 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1950 Allard K1. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Compass weights approximately 326 kg more than 1950 Allard K1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1950 Allard K1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Allard K1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Allard K1 (203 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Jeep Compass. (141 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1950 Allard K1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Jeep Compass.

Compare all specifications: