1950 Allard K1 vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K1 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A6 (242 HP) has 157 more horse power than 1950 Allard K1. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K1.
Because 1950 Allard K1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Allard K1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard K1 | 2012 Audi A6 | |
Make | Allard | Audi |
Model | K1 | A6 |
Year Released | 1950 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 242 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4915 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2911 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 113 L | 75 L |