1950 Allard K1 vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K1 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Roadster weights approximately 178 kg more than 1950 Allard K1.
Because 1950 Allard K1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Allard K1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Roadster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Roadster (260 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Allard K1. (203 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Allard K1.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard K1 | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
Make | Allard | Mini |
Model | K1 | Roadster |
Year Released | 1950 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 260 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1067 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3734 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 113 L | 50 L |