1950 Allard K2 vs. 1956 Austin A 95
To start off, 1956 Austin A 95 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Austin A 95 (92 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Austin A 95 should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin A 95 weights approximately 155 kg more than 1950 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Allard K2 | 1956 Austin A 95 | |
| Make | Allard | Austin |
| Model | K2 | A 95 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2639 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 92 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2690 mm |
