1950 Allard K2 vs. 1957 Austin Princess
To start off, 1957 Austin Princess is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Austin Princess (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1957 Austin Princess should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Austin Princess weights approximately 985 kg more than 1950 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Allard K2 | 1957 Austin Princess | |
| Make | Allard | Austin |
| Model | K2 | Princess |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1957 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3992 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 2180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3360 mm |
