1950 Allard K2 vs. 1959 Saab 95
To start off, 1959 Saab 95 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Allard K2 (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1959 Saab 95. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 1959 Saab 95. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Allard K2 weights approximately 285 kg more than 1959 Saab 95. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Saab 95, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Allard K2 | 1959 Saab 95 | |
| Make | Allard | Saab |
| Model | K2 | 95 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 841 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2500 mm |
