1950 Allard K2 vs. 1961 Chrysler Imperial
To start off, 1961 Chrysler Imperial is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 5,802 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Chrysler Imperial is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Chrysler Imperial (276 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Chrysler Imperial should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Chrysler Imperial weights approximately 1165 kg more than 1950 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Allard K2 | 1961 Chrysler Imperial | |
| Make | Allard | Chrysler |
| Model | K2 | Imperial |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 5802 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 2360 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 6170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3800 mm |
