1950 Allard K2 vs. 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III
To start off, 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (146 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Allard K2 weights approximately 15 kg more than 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard K2 | 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | |
Make | Allard | Austin-Healey |
Model | K2 | 3000 Mk III |
Year Released | 1950 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2340 mm |