1950 Allard K2 vs. 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230
To start off, 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230 (150 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230 should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230 weights approximately 100 kg more than 1950 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard K2 | 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230 | |
Make | Allard | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | K2 | 230 |
Year Released | 1950 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2410 mm |