1950 Allard K2 vs. 1964 Ford GT 40
To start off, 1964 Ford GT 40 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 265 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Allard K2 weights approximately 331 kg more than 1964 Ford GT 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Allard K2 | 1964 Ford GT 40 | |
| Make | Allard | Ford |
| Model | K2 | GT 40 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 864 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2420 mm |
