1950 Allard K2 vs. 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle
To start off, 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,768 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle (140 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle weights approximately 306 kg more than 1950 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard K2 | 1968 Chevrolet Chevelle | |
Make | Allard | Chevrolet |
Model | K2 | Chevelle |
Year Released | 1950 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3768 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1501 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2950 mm |