1950 Allard K2 vs. 1968 Holden Belmont
To start off, 1968 Holden Belmont is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Allard K2 (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1968 Holden Belmont. (76 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Holden Belmont weights approximately 5 kg more than 1950 Allard K2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Allard K2 | 1968 Holden Belmont | |
| Make | Allard | Holden |
| Model | K2 | Belmont |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2130 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 76 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2830 mm |
