1950 Allard K2 vs. 1969 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1969 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac DeVille (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 910 kg more than 1950 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard K2 | 1969 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Allard | Cadillac |
Model | K2 | DeVille |
Year Released | 1950 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 7734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 2105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3300 mm |