1950 Allard K2 vs. 1975 Triumph Stag
To start off, 1975 Triumph Stag is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Triumph Stag (143 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Triumph Stag should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Triumph Stag weights approximately 16 kg more than 1950 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Allard K2 | 1975 Triumph Stag | |
| Make | Allard | Triumph |
| Model | K2 | Stag |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1211 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2550 mm |
