1950 Allard K2 vs. 1979 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 1979 Triumph Spitfire is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Allard K2 (85 HP) has 28 more horse power than 1979 Triumph Spitfire. (57 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 1979 Triumph Spitfire. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Allard K2 weights approximately 408 kg more than 1979 Triumph Spitfire. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard K2 | 1979 Triumph Spitfire | |
Make | Allard | Triumph |
Model | K2 | Spitfire |
Year Released | 1950 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 57 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 787 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2110 mm |