1950 Allard K2 vs. 1981 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1981 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 360 kg more than 1950 Allard K2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard K2 | 1981 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Allard | Chevrolet |
Model | K2 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1950 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 4097 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1555 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2750 mm |