1950 Allard K2 vs. 1981 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1981 Ford Mustang is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Ford Mustang (173 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Ford Mustang weights approximately 160 kg more than 1950 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard K2 | 1981 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Allard | Ford |
Model | K2 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1950 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 4942 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2560 mm |