1950 Allard K2 vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 1982 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Allard K2 (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Pajero. (83 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Pajero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mitsubishi Pajero weights approximately 405 kg more than 1950 Allard K2.
Because 1982 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard K2 | 1982 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
Make | Allard | Mitsubishi |
Model | K2 | Pajero |
Year Released | 1950 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2477 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2710 mm |