1950 Allard K2 vs. 1985 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1985 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Nissan Bluebird (105 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Allard K2 weights approximately 25 kg more than 1985 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 1950 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Nissan Bluebird, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Allard K2 | 1985 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Allard | Nissan |
| Model | K2 | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1973 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2560 mm |
