1950 Allard K2 vs. 1986 Acura Integra
To start off, 1986 Acura Integra is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Acura Integra (125 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2.
Because 1950 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1986 Acura Integra has automatic transmission and 1950 Allard K2 has manual transmission. 1950 Allard K2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1986 Acura Integra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard K2 | 1986 Acura Integra | |
Make | Allard | Acura |
Model | K2 | Integra |
Year Released | 1950 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 125 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4355 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1665 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2520 mm |