1950 Allard K2 vs. 1986 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 1986 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Allard K2 (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Allard K2 weights approximately 355 kg more than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard K2 | 1986 Fiat Ritmo | |
Make | Allard | Fiat |
Model | K2 | Ritmo |
Year Released | 1950 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1116 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2460 mm |