1950 Allard K2 vs. 1988 Mercury Sable
To start off, 1988 Mercury Sable is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Mercury Sable weights approximately 205 kg more than 1950 Allard K2.
Because 1950 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Allard K2 | 1988 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | Allard | Mercury |
| Model | K2 | Sable |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2513 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 6 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2700 mm |
