1950 Allard K2 vs. 1991 Acura Integra
To start off, 1991 Acura Integra is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Acura Integra (138 HP) has 53 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2.
Because 1950 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Allard K2 | 1991 Acura Integra | |
| Make | Allard | Acura |
| Model | K2 | Integra |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 138 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2560 mm |
