1950 Allard K2 vs. 1993 Ford Contour
To start off, 1993 Ford Contour is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Ford Contour (168 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Ford Contour should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Ford Contour weights approximately 118 kg more than 1950 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Ford Contour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard K2 | 1993 Ford Contour | |
Make | Allard | Ford |
Model | K2 | Contour |
Year Released | 1950 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2544 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2710 mm |