1950 Allard K2 vs. 1994 Rover 400
To start off, 1994 Rover 400 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Rover 400 (88 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Rover 400 should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Rover 400 weights approximately 45 kg more than 1950 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Allard K2 | 1994 Rover 400 | |
| Make | Allard | Rover |
| Model | K2 | 400 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 88 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1240 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2560 mm |
