1950 Allard K2 vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 615 kg more than 1950 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard K2 | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Allard | Mitsubishi |
Model | K2 | Challenger |
Year Released | 1950 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2835 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2730 mm |