1950 Allard K2 vs. 1997 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1997 Ford Mustang is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Mustang (590 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 505 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Allard K2 weights approximately 265 kg more than 1997 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Allard K2 | 1997 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Allard | Ford |
| Model | K2 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 590 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2580 mm |
