1950 Allard K2 vs. 2000 Audi Rosemeyer
To start off, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 8,003 cc (16 cylinders), 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (630 HP) has 545 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Allard K2 weights approximately 295 kg more than 2000 Audi Rosemeyer.
Because 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Allard K2 | 2000 Audi Rosemeyer | |
| Make | Allard | Audi |
| Model | K2 | Rosemeyer |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 8003 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | W |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 630 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2920 mm |
