1950 Allard K2 vs. 2000 BMW M3
To start off, 2000 BMW M3 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW M3 (325 HP @ 7750 RPM) has 240 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW M3 weights approximately 375 kg more than 1950 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Allard K2 | 2000 BMW M3 | |
| Make | Allard | BMW |
| Model | K2 | M3 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3168 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 325 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 7750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1570 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2730 mm |
