1950 Allard K2 vs. 2001 Bristol Project Fighter
To start off, 2001 Bristol Project Fighter is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 7,990 cc (10 cylinders), 2001 Bristol Project Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Bristol Project Fighter (400 HP) has 315 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Bristol Project Fighter should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Bristol Project Fighter weights approximately 203 kg more than 1950 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Bristol Project Fighter, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Allard K2 | 2001 Bristol Project Fighter | |
| Make | Allard | Bristol |
| Model | K2 | Project Fighter |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 7990 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 400 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1398 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2900 mm |
