1950 Allard K2 vs. 2001 Mitsubishi RPM 7000
To start off, 2001 Mitsubishi RPM 7000 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mitsubishi RPM 7000 (311 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi RPM 7000 should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mitsubishi RPM 7000 weights approximately 710 kg more than 1950 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Mitsubishi RPM 7000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi RPM 7000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard K2 | 2001 Mitsubishi RPM 7000 | |
Make | Allard | Mitsubishi |
Model | K2 | RPM 7000 |
Year Released | 1950 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2650 mm |