1950 Allard K2 vs. 2002 Chevrolet Blazer
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 605 kg more than 1950 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard K2 | 2002 Chevrolet Blazer | |
Make | Allard | Chevrolet |
Model | K2 | Blazer |
Year Released | 1950 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 4300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2720 mm |