1950 Allard K2 vs. 2003 Opel Meriva
To start off, 2003 Opel Meriva is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Allard K2 (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2003 Opel Meriva. (81 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 2003 Opel Meriva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Opel Meriva weights approximately 160 kg more than 1950 Allard K2.
Because 1950 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Opel Meriva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard K2 | 2003 Opel Meriva | |
Make | Allard | Opel |
Model | K2 | Meriva |
Year Released | 1950 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2520 mm |