1950 Allard K2 vs. 2003 Peugeot 307

To start off, 2003 Peugeot 307 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Peugeot 307 (134 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Peugeot 307 should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Peugeot 307 weights approximately 293 kg more than 1950 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1950 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Peugeot 307, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Peugeot 307 has automatic transmission and 1950 Allard K2 has manual transmission. 1950 Allard K2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Peugeot 307 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: