1950 Allard K2 vs. 2003 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2003 Renault Kangoo is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Kangoo (97 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Kangoo should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Allard K2 weights approximately 90 kg more than 2003 Renault Kangoo.
Because 1950 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Kangoo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard K2 | 2003 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Allard | Renault |
Model | K2 | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1950 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2610 mm |