1950 Allard K2 vs. 2004 Caterham 7
To start off, 2004 Caterham 7 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Caterham 7 (200 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Allard K2 weights approximately 655 kg more than 2004 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard K2 | 2004 Caterham 7 | |
Make | Allard | Caterham |
Model | K2 | 7 |
Year Released | 1950 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2230 mm |