1950 Allard K2 vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Allard K2 (85 HP) has 18 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1950 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard K2 | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Allard | Ford |
Model | K2 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1950 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2490 mm |