1950 Allard K2 vs. 2005 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Astro (187 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 755 kg more than 1950 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Allard K2 | 2005 Chevrolet Astro | |
| Make | Allard | Chevrolet |
| Model | K2 | Astro |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 4294 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2830 mm |
